Dr. Paul Craig Roberts Review
Here’s what Dr. Paul Craig Roberts had to say on September 10, 2013 – one day before the 12th anniversary of “9/11”. “Too Many Years Of Lies: From Mossadeq to 9/11” is how he began.
“Still in America today official denial takes precedence over science and known undisputed facts. On this 12th anniversary of a false-flag event, it is necessary for me to report the voluminous evidence that conclusively proves that the official story is a lie. You can read it for yourself. It is available online.
“Washington has been at war for 12 years. According to experts such as Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, these wars have cost Americans approximately $ 6 trillion, enough to keep Social Security and Medicare sound for years. All there is to show for 12 years of war is fat bank balances for the armament industries and a list of destroyed countries with millions of dead and dislocated people who never lifted a hand against the United States.
“The cost paid by American troops and taxpayers is extreme. Secretary of Veteran Affairs Erik Shinseki reported in November 2009 that ‘more veterans have committed suicide since 2001 than we have lost on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.’ Many thousands of our troops have suffered amputations and traumatic brain injuries. At the Marine Corps War College Jim Lacey calculated that the annual cost of the Afghan war was $ 1.5 billion for each al-Qaeda member in Afghanistan. Many US and coalition troops paid with their lives for every one al-Qaeda member killed. On no basis has the war ever made sense.
“Washington’s wars have destroyed the favorable image of the United States created over the decades of the cold war. No longer the hope of mankind, the US today is viewed as a threat whose government cannot be trusted.
“The wars that have left America’s reputation in tatters are the consequence of 9/11. The neoconservatives who advocate America’s hegemony over the world called for ‘a new Pearl Harbor’ that would allow them to launch wars of conquest. Their plan for conquering the Middle East as their starting point was set out in the neoconservative ‘Project For the New American Century.’ It was stated clearly by Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz and also by many neoconservatives.
“The neocon argument boils down to a claim that history has chosen ‘democratic capitalism’ and not Karl Marx as the future. To comply with history’s choice, the US must beef up its military and impose the American Way on the entire world.
“In other words, as Claes Ryn wrote, the American neoconservatives are the ‘new Jacobins,’ a reference to the French Revolution of 1789 that intended to overthrow autocratic Europe and replace it with ‘Liberty, equality, fraternity,’ but instead gave Europe a quarter century of war, death and destruction.
“Ideologies are dangerous, because they are immune to facts. Now that the United States is no longer governed by the US Constitution, but by a crazed ideology that has given rise to a domestic police state more complete than that of Communist East Germany and to a warfare state that attacks sovereign countries based on nothing but manufactured lies, we are left with the irony that Russia and China are viewed as constraints on Washington’s ability to inflict evil, death and destruction on the world. The two pariah states of the 20th century have become the hope of mankind in the 21st century!
“As Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick prove in their book, The Untold History of the United States, the American government has never deserved its white hat reputation. Washington has been very successful in dressing up its crimes in moralistic language and hiding them in secrecy. It is only decades after the event that the truth comes out.
“For example, on August 19, 1953, the democratically elected government of Iran was overthrown by a coup instigated by the US government. Sixty years after the event, declassified CIA documents detail how the secret CIA operation overthrew a democratic government and imposed Washington’s puppet on the people of Iran.
“The declassified documents could not have spelled it out any clearer. ‘The military coup that overthrew Mossadeq and his national front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.’
“In the 21st century Washington is attempting to repeat its 1953 feat of overthrowing the Iranian government, this time using the faux ‘green revolution’ financed by Washington. When that fails, Washington will rely on military action.
“If 60 years is the time that must pass before Washington’s crimes can be acknowledged, the US government will admit the truth about September 11, 2001 on September 11, 2061. In 2013, on this 12th anniversary of 9/11, we have only 48 years to go before Washington admits the truth. Alas, the members of the 9/11 truth movement will not still be alive to receive their vindication.
“But just as it has been known for decades that Washington overthrew Mossadeq, we already know that the official story of 9/11 is hogwash.
“No evidence exists that supports the government’s 9/11 story. The 9/11 Commission was a political gathering run by a neoconservative White House operative. The Commission members sat and listened to the government’s story and wrote it down. No investigation of any kind was made. One member of the Commission resigned, saying that the fix was in. After the report was published, both co-chairmen of the Commission and the legal counsel wrote books dissociating themselves from the report. The 9/11 Commission was ‘set up to fail,’ they wrote.
“NIST’s account of the structural failure of the twin towers is a computer simulation based on assumptions chosen to produce the result. NIST refuses to release its make-believe explanation for expert scrutiny. The reason is obvious. The NIST’s explanation of the structural failure of the towers cannot survive scrutiny.
“There are many 9/11 Truth organizations whose members are high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemists and nano-chemists, military and civilian airline pilots, firemen and first responders, former prominent government officials, and 9/11 families. The evidence they have amassed overwhelms the feeble official account.
“It has been proven conclusively that World Trade Center Building 7 fell at free-fall, which can only be achieved by controlled demolition that removes all resistance below to debris falling from above so that no time is lost in overcoming resistance from intact structures. NIST has acknowledged this fact, but has not changed its story.
“In other words, still in America today official denial takes precedence over science and known undisputed facts.
“On this 12th anniversary of a false-flag event, it is unnecessary for me to report the voluminous evidence that conclusively proves that the official story is a lie. You can read it for yourself. It is available online. You can read what the architects and engineers have to say. You can read the scientists’ reports. You can hear from the first responders who were in the WTC towers. You can read the pilots who say that the maneuvers associated with the airliner that allegedly hit the Pentagon are beyond their skills and most certainly were not performed by inexperienced pilots.
“You can read David Griffin’s many books. You can watch the film produced by Richard Gage and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. You can read the 9/11 Toronto Report, International Hearings on 9/11. You can read this book.
“Actually, you do not need any of the expert evidence to know that the US governments’ story is false. As I have previously pointed out, had a few young Saudi Arabians – the alleged 9/11 hijackers – been capable of outwitting, without support from any government and intelligence service, not only the CIA and FBI, but all 16 US intelligence services, the intelligence services of Washington’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad, the National Security Council, NORAD, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Traffic Control, and defeat Airport Security four times in one hour on the same morning – the White House, Congress, and the media would have been demanding an investigation of how the National Security State could so totally fail.
“Instead, the President of the United States and every government office fiercely resisted any investigation. It was only after a year of demands and rising pressure from the 9/11 families that the 9/11 Commission was created to bury the issue.
“No one in government was held accountable for the astonishing failure, that the national security state was defeated by a few rag-tag Muslims with box cutters and a sick old man dying from renal failure while holed up in a cave in Afghanistan, and no heads rolled.
“The total absence from the government for demands for an investigation of an event that is the greatest embarrassment to a ‘superpower’ in world history is a complete give-away that 9/11 was a false-flag event. The government did not want any investigation, because the government’s cover story cannot stand investigation.
“The government could rely on the mega-media corporations in whose hands the corrupt Clinton regime concentrated the US media. By supporting rather than investigating the government’s cover story, the media left the majority of Americans, who are sensitive to peer pressure, without any support for their doubts. Effectively, the American Ministry of Propaganda validated the government’s false story.
“Common everyday experiences of Americans refute the government’s story. Consider, for example, self-cleaning ovens. How many American homes have them? Thirty million? More? Do you have one? Do you know what temperature self-cleaning ovens reach? The self-cleaning cycle runs for several hours at 900 degrees Fahrenheit or 482 degrees Celsius. Does your self-cleaning oven melt at 482 degrees Celsius? No, it doesn’t. Does the very thin one-inch steel soften or even collapse? No, it doesn’t.
“Keep that in mind while you read this: According to tests performed by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), only 2% of the WTC steel tested by NIST reached temperature as high as 250 degrees Celsius, about half the temperature reached by your self-cleaning oven. Do you believe that such low temperatures on such small areas of the WTC towers caused the massive, thick, steel columns in the towers to soften and permit the collapse of the buildings? If you do, please explain why your self-cleaning oven doesn’t weaken or collapse.
“In Section E.5 of the Executive Summary in this NIST report, it says: ‘A method was developed using microscopic observations of paint cracking to determine whether steel members had experienced temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C. More than 170 areas were examined … Only three locations had a positive result indicating that the steel and paint may have reached temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C.’ Analysis of steel ‘microstructures show no evidence of exposure to temperatures above 600 degrees C for any significant time.’
“In section 3.6 of the NIST report, NIST states: ‘NIST believes that this collection of steel from the WTC towers is adequate for purposes of the investigation.’
“How did these truths get out? My explanation is that the NIST scientists, resentful of the threat to their jobs and future employment opportunities and chaffing under the order to produce a false report, revealed the coerced deception by including information that their political masters did not understand. By stating unequivocally the actual temperatures, NIST’s scientists put the lie to the coerced report.
“The melting point of steel is around 1,500 degrees C, or 2,600 degrees F. Steel can lose strength at lower temperatures, but the NIST scientists reported that only a small part of the steel was even subjected to moderate temperatures less than those obtained by the self-cleaning oven in your home.
“If you need to think about this a bit more, obtain a copy of The Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. Have a look at the streetcar in photo 108. The caption reads: ‘The Hiroshima fireball instantly raised surface temperatures within a mile of the hypocenter well above 1,000 degrees F.’ Is the streetcar a melted lump of steel? No, it is structurally intact, although blackened with burnt paint.
“Washington would have you believe that steel that survived intact the atomic bomb would melt from low temperature, short lived, isolated office fires. What do you think of a government that believes you are that stupid?
“Who would support a government that lies every time it opens its mouth?
“The three WTC buildings that were destroyed were massive heat sinks. I doubt that the limited, short lived, low-temperature fires in the buildings even warmed the massive steel structures to the touch.
“Moreover, not a single steel column melted or deformed from softening. The columns were severed at specific lengths by extremely high temperatures charges placed on the columns.
“On this 12th anniversary of 9/11, ask yourself if you really want to believe that temperatures half those reached by your self-cleaning oven caused three massive steel structures to crumble into dust.
“Then ask yourself why your government thinks that you are so totally stupid as to believe such a fairy tale as your government told you about 9/11.” –
[The obvious reason for this belief on the part of their government is that Americans have consistently believed in fairy tales authored and disseminated by their leaders. Some examples of this mythology? Well for starters, here’s a short list of the most well-known setups:
– When Germany invaded Poland from the west, Russia invaded from the east. But we blame Germany for the start of World War II, and we allied ourselves with Russia.
– The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was provoked by the United States, and was being tracked even before the Japanese aircraft arrived. FDR and others needed a way to get America into World War II. Old battleships were sent from San Diego to Pearl Harbor to be targeted, and all aircraft carriers were put out to the safety of the high seas. Our newly developed radar tracked the Japanese planes as they were making their way toward Oahu.
– The U.S. government continues to state that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK. He didn’t, and the perpetrators made sure we didn’t get to hear Oswald’s “side of the story.”
– The Gulf of Tonkin Incident – Those supposed attacks on a U.S. destroyer that got us into the Vietnam War never took place.
– Iraq’s attack on Kuwait in 1990 that led up to the First Gulf War was actually approved in advance by U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie on July 25th, 1990.
– Iraq’s possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) was a complete fabrication. There was never a reason to engage in a Second Gulf War.
– Although it is has been documented that Osama bin Laden died of renal failure in 2001, President Obama decided to send in Navy Seals to kill him (again). It was a grandstand play, and those Navy Seals were said to have died in a suspicious helicopter crash – before we were allowed to hear their “side of the story.”]
What a coincidence.